Open Culture

Can’t access Sci-Hub?

Solution 1

Use mirrors,,,

Solution 2

Install a free VPN or Tor Browser.

Solution 3

Change your DNS (sometimes works, but works beautifully). ISPs/countries often block Sci-Hub via DNS. You can change your DNS to CloudFlare DNS or other DNS provider.

Solution 4

Request articles using the Official Telegram Sci-Hub Bot or Nexus Search Telegram also provides a historical archive.

Why is Sci-Hub showing me a blank page or error? The article won’t show up.

  1. If the article is from 2021 or late 2020 then Sci-Hub will not download it for you. Sci-Hub froze new downloads globally during the court trial in India, which means no new papers. You can still access the papers Sci-Hub has already saved.
  2. If Sci-Hub is delivering a white page or a Russian error message then that journal may be inaccessible for other technical reasons.

How else can I download articles for free?

  1. ResearchGate or have many papers that have been uploaded by authors.
  2. Try the OpenAccess Button or Unpaywall
  3. Try e-mailing the authors
  4. Request the article via /r/Scholar or another group

Official Sci-Hub Mirrors

These official links are the ones listed on the official VK or the former Twitter.

Official Sci-Hub Social

Trusted Third-Party Scimag Archives

scimag is an archive of more than 80 million Sci-Hub-indexed articles provided by the Library Genesis project mirrors. Enter a DOI to search the archive. Note that this archive is only a snapshot of articles previously requested by Sci-Hub users in the past and cannot proxy you to fresh articles.

Trusted Third-Party Extensions and Software

► Audiobook Sites

► Calibre Libraries

► Reading Sites

libgen clones

Z-Library Mirrors

▷ Classic Sites

▷ Children’s Sites

▷ Educational Sites

▷ History Sites

▷ Documents / Articles

► Magazine Sites

► Newspaper Sites

► Reference Sites

► Helpful Sites / Apps

File Sharing Host List

FilePizzasharedropxkcd949wetransferjustbeamitlufisend.tresoritshare.riseupufilevolafileput.reenvelopswisstransferglobaluploadUploadCenterBayfilesFireLoadmsharescyberdropCum.zonetresoritpixeldrainanonfilesStrongFilesSecureHadropmbzippysharecatboxfilewhoppermediafiremultiupmegaupanonymousfilesfiledropperfilesuploadclicknuploadmixdroptusfilesgofilemegadmca.gripelolisafesafe.fierytakemetospacefileupsafe.0x0vortexlolisareiizuawooanonvodkafile.lozy.pinkgachimuchimyonrimsafethirdrei.chloli.solutionsbtrfsafuckinglefuckingweebsafe.vikavoimoutozzediskttmyoudboxge.ttsendanywhere1fichier9xuploadindisharedesiuploaduploadflixfilestorehubfilesuploadrajadoodrivedownload.ggdl.freemegaupupload.eedatafilehostdropapktusfilesupload.vaa.redsql.ggteknikstarfilesopacitysend / instances

File Conversion Tools

CloudConvertFile ConverterBear File ConverterFreeConvertOnline ConvertConvertioZamzarOnline ConverterFormat Factory

In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub

In Antoine de Saint Exupéry’s tale the Little Prince meets a businessman who accumulates stars with the sole purpose of being able to buy more stars. The Little Prince is perplexed. He owns only a flower, which he waters every day. Three volcanoes, which he cleans every week. “It is of some use to my volcanoes, and it is of some use to my flower, that I own them,” he says, “but you are of no use to the stars that you own”.

There are many businessmen who own knowledge today. Consider Elsevier, the largest scholarly publisher, whose 37% profit margin1 stands in sharp contrast to the rising fees, expanding student loan debt and poverty-level wages for adjunct faculty. Elsevier owns some of the largest databases of academic material, which are licensed at prices so scandalously high that even Harvard, the richest university of the global north, has complained that it cannot afford them any longer. Robert Darnton, the past director of Harvard Library, says “We faculty do the research, write the papers, referee papers by other researchers, serve on editorial boards, all of it for free … and then we buy back the results of our labour at outrageous prices.”2 For all the work supported by public money benefiting scholarly publishers, particularly the peer review that grounds their legitimacy, journal articles are priced such that they prohibit access to science to many academics – and all non-academics – across the world, and render it a token of privilege.3

Elsevier has recently filed a copyright infringement suit in New York against Science Hub and Library Genesis claiming millions of dollars in damages.4 This has come as a big blow, not just to the administrators of the websites but also to thousands of researchers around the world for whom these sites are the only viable source of academic materials. The social media, mailing lists and IRC channels have been filled with their distress messages, desperately seeking articles and publications.

Even as the New York District Court was delivering its injunction, news came of the entire editorial board of highly-esteemed journal Lingua handing in their collective resignation, citing as their reason the refusal by Elsevier to go open access and give up on the high fees it charges to authors and their academic institutions. As we write these lines, a petition is doing the rounds demanding that Taylor & Francis doesn’t shut down Ashgate5, a formerly independent humanities publisher that it acquired earlier in 2015. It is threatened to go the way of other small publishers that are being rolled over by the growing monopoly and concentration in the publishing market. These are just some of the signs that the system is broken. It devalues us, authors, editors and readers alike. It parasites on our labor, it thwarts our service to the public, it denies us access6.

We have the means and methods to make knowledge accessible to everyone, with no economic barrier to access and at a much lower cost to society. But closed access’s monopoly over academic publishing, its spectacular profits and its central role in the allocation of academic prestige trump the public interest. Commercial publishers effectively impede open access, criminalize us, prosecute our heroes and heroines, and destroy our libraries, again and again. Before Science Hub and Library Genesis there was or Gigapedia; before Gigapedia there was; before there was little; and before there was little there was nothing. That’s what they want: to reduce most of us back to nothing. And they have the full support of the courts and law to do exactly that.7

In Elsevier’s case against Sci-Hub and Library Genesis, the judge said: “simply making copyrighted content available for free via a foreign website, disserves the public interest”8. Alexandra Elbakyan’s original plea put the stakes much higher: “If Elsevier manages to shut down our projects or force them into the darknet, that will demonstrate an important idea: that the public does not have the right to knowledge.”

We demonstrate daily, and on a massive scale, that the system is broken. We share our writing secretly behind the backs of our publishers, circumvent paywalls to access articles and publications, digitize and upload books to libraries. This is the other side of 37% profit margins: our knowledge commons grows in the fault lines of a broken system. We are all custodians of knowledge, custodians of the same infrastructures that we depend on for producing knowledge, custodians of our fertile but fragile commons. To be a custodian is, de facto, to download, to share, to read, to write, to review, to edit, to digitize, to archive, to maintain libraries, to make them accessible. It is to be of use to, not to make property of, our knowledge commons.

More than seven years ago Aaron Swartz, who spared no risk in standing up for what we here urge you to stand up for too, wrote: “We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with the world. We need to take stuff that’s out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Access. With enough of us, around the world, we’ll not just send a strong message opposing the privatization of knowledge — we’ll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us?”9

We find ourselves at a decisive moment. This is the time to recognize that the very existence of our massive knowledge commons is an act of collective civil disobedience. It is the time to emerge from hiding and put our names behind this act of resistance. You may feel isolated, but there are many of us. The anger, desperation and fear of losing our library infrastructures, voiced across the internet, tell us that. This is the time for us custodians, being dogs, humans or cyborgs, with our names, nicknames and pseudonyms, to raise our voices.

30 November 2015

Dušan Barok, Josephine Berry, Bodó Balázs, Sean Dockray, Kenneth Goldsmith, Anthony Iles, Lawrence Liang, Sebastian Lütgert, Pauline van Mourik Broekman, Marcell Mars, spideralex, Tomislav Medak, Dubravka Sekulić, Femke Snelting…


  1. Larivière, Vincent, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon. “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.” PLoS ONE 10, no. 6 (June 10, 2015): e0127502. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127502.,
    The Obscene Profits of Commercial Scholarly Publishers.” Accessed November 30, 2015.
  2. Sample, Ian. “Harvard University Says It Can’t Afford Journal Publishers’ Prices.” The Guardian, April 24, 2012, sec. Science.
  3. Academic Paywalls Mean Publish and Perish – Al Jazeera English.” Accessed November 30, 2015.
  4. Sci-Hub Tears Down Academia’s ‘Illegal’ Copyright Paywalls.” TorrentFreak. Accessed November 30, 2015.
  5. Save Ashgate Publishing.” Accessed November 30, 2015.
  6. The Cost of Knowledge.” Accessed November 30, 2015.
  7. In fact, with the TPP and TTIP being rushed through the legislative process, no domain registrar, ISP provider, host or human rights organization will be able to prevent copyright industries and courts from criminalizing and shutting down websites “expeditiously”.
  8. Court Orders Shutdown of Libgen, Bookfi and Sci-Hub.” TorrentFreak. Accessed November 30, 2015.
  9. Guerilla Open Access Manifesto.” Internet Archive. Accessed November 30, 2015.

Guerilla Open Access Manifesto

Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep it for themselves. The world’s entire scientific and cultural heritage, published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations. Want to read the papers featuring the most famous results of the sciences? You’ll need to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier.

There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under terms that allow anyone to access it. But even under the best scenarios, their work will only apply to things published in the future. Everything up until now will have been lost.

That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read the work of their colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing the folks at Google to read them?Providing scientific articles to those at elite universities in the First World, but not to children in the Global South? It’s outrageous and unacceptable.

“I agree,” many say, “but what can we do? The companies hold the copyrights, theymake enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and it’s perfectly legal —there’s nothing we can do to stop them.” But there is something we can, something that’salready being done: we can fight back.

Those with access to these resources — students, librarians, scientists — you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not — indeed, morally, you cannot — keep this privilege for yourselves. You have a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords with colleagues, filling download requests for friends.

Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You have been sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the information locked up by the publishers and sharing them with your friends.

But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. It’s called stealing or piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the moral equivalent of plundering a ship and murdering its crew. But sharing isn’t immoral — it’s a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would refuse to let a friend make a copy.

Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which they operate require it — their shareholders would revolt at anything less. And the politicians they have bought off back them, passing laws giving them the exclusive power to decide who can make copies.

There is no justice in following unjust laws. It’s time to come into the light and, in the grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our opposition to this private theft of public culture.

We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and share them with the world. We need to take stuff that’s out of copyright and add it to the archive. We need to buy secret databases and put them on the Web. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Access.

With enough of us, around the world, we’ll not just send a strong message opposing the privatization of knowledge — we’ll make it a thing of the past. Will you join us?

Aaron Swartz
July 2008, Eremo, Italy

The Open Access Guerilla Cookbook

1 reply

  1. Of course a lot must have happened since this campaign begin. I feel bad for not searching a little harder on the internet to find your website years before. But I didn’t think there might be a place where people stand and fight for free education rights of all. I’ve paid in an online course for 6 months duration assuming that’s the only choice I’ve left to get guidance for enrollment in my choice of subject. I had to put in all my savings into it. Here, I should mention it was the money I had saved, after over 2 years of full-time work, to invest in my college education.
    What you are supporting is the need of time. I aspire to become an English professor some day. However, I always knew I would give back in return of all the privilege I’ve had in reaching there. I don’t remember the last time I read something as honest as these words. And I’m more certain than ever before that I too will do what I can by sharing the knowledge I’ve attained so far and will attain in the future with those who don’t have access to it.
    I don’t support any cause unless I’m certain of its authenticity and influence but your truth hits deepest.
    I’ll be more than happy to support your cause in any I could.
    All the best and Thank You so much for the initiative and all that I’m yet to learn from your platform.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: